andere Teams » does that go? Whats go

YAS MARINA, Abu Dhabi -- Sebastian Vettel thinks Red Bull will be vulnerable in the opening stages of the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix and hopes Ferrari can capitalise.Vettel qualified fifth, though there was less than 0.1s covering Daniel Ricciardo and Ferrari teammate Kimi Raikkonen in the two positions ahead. Ferraris drivers split the Red Bulls, who both progressed through Q2 with the super-soft tyre, meaning they will both start on a different compound to the Ferraris.The super-soft tyre should go longer than the ultra-soft but may have less grip off the line, something Vettel thinks Ferrari can use to its advantage to make sure both Red Bulls are behind in the early stages.When asked if Ferrari considered the super-soft tyre tactic in Q2, Vettel replied: We dont feel that is an advantage so it will be interesting to see what happens. It will make them a bit vulnerable in the first lap and maybe we can capitalise on that. For the race I think it should be close, we are usually a bit stronger on Sundays than Saturdays so the target is to aim for podiums tomorrow.Vettel had topped FP3 earlier in the day and thinks Ferrari was too aggressive on its set-up between that session and qualifying, which takes place in the evening as the sun goes down.Speaking about a moment on his final lap when Max Verstappen went off the circuit ahead of him, he said: Yes, he went off and I saw some smoke and then I passed him, well I dont think he was in the way but I lost a little bit of rhythm and the last sector wasnt as tidy as it should have been, otherwise I think we would have gone to P3.The problem was more that in qualifying I was struggling to find the rhythm, I think we were a bit too aggressive and trying to anticipate the conditions tonight so I got caught out a little bit. It was coming towards us at the end but it was a shame qualifying didnt continue. NMD Sverige . Soukalova missed only one target and completed the 15-kilometre course in 40 minutes, 32.6 seconds for both victories in this seasons individual discipline. Darya Domracheva of Belarus was second, 34. Yeezy Boost 700 v2 Sverige . But what about the officials? Every sport has officials and they also have stories about hard work and sacrifice but their accomplishments are seldom recognized by anyone outside their inner circle. http://www.yeezyssverige.com/ . Badenhop was 2-3 with a 3.47 ERA in 63 relief appearances for Milwaukee this season. He is 18-20 in his career with three saves and a 3. Yeezy Powerphase Sverige . -- For the first time in two months, an opponent was standing up to Alabama. NMD Skor Herr Rea . Datsyuk will miss Tuesdays game against New Jersey and could be sidelined longer, while Cleary will likely miss at least the next three games. Its been an injury-plagued season for Datsyuk, who has suited up for just 39 games. Ross Brawns future in Formula One has been the source of much speculation in recent weeks and he has been linked with several jobs at the top of the sport, including Bernie Ecclestones.According to the man himself, the rumours of his new career path are somewhat exaggerated. This week he confirmed that he has been advising the sports new investors Liberty Media about the workings of Formula One, but says his current involvement ends there.Ive given a little advice to Liberty Media on Formula One, because they wanted to have a perspective on the business from someone who has been involved and someone who is not involved in a team anymore, Brawn told ESPN. I didnt have any angles or axes to grind, it was just my view on Formula One and the characters involved and teams etcetera.Could that role evolve into something more when Liberty completes its purchase of Formula One early next year?Its always Libertys decision, but there has been no serious discussion, Brawn says. Ive given them some help to understand Formula One a bit more and they have to complete the transaction and then see what happens. I think they recognise that Bernie is a pretty key element in all of this, because of the relationships, experience and the knowledge, so I think Liberty appear to be a very sensible company and they are going to proceed cautiously.But I hope they take on-board the idea of creating a plan for the future, which is contributed to by a number of elements. What do we want Formula One to look like in three to five years time? Are the criticisms that are made today fair and can they be addressed? Everyone wants to see more racing, but how much more racing do you want to see because you can have too much of a good thing -- it can seriously get boring if its there every week and it never changes.The rumours about Brawn returning to the sport in a rule-making capacity extend back to 2015 when Red Bull boss Christian Horner put the ex-Mercedes team principal forward as a candidate to oversee the changes to the regulations for 2017. Brawn was not a part of those changes in the end, but the idea of a job guiding the direction of the sport via its regulatory body the FIA does hold some appeal.Thats possible. If that became the best channel to influence and be part of a better Formula One then its not out of the question. Its not my natural environment if Im honest, but thats not a criticism oof the FIA, its a criticism of me!That may be a possibility for the future, who knows? I think when the dust settles and we see whats going to happen and on what time scale, then we can make better judgements on if I get involved and in what capacity.ddddddddddddut Brawn is clear on one thing: if he does return to Formula One, the sport has to be willing to put a long-term plan in place.I think one of the frustrations for me is that there never seemed to be a plan and everything was reactive. Therefore, I think it would be good for Formula One to try to formulate a plan and a strategy of where it wants to be in three years time or five years time.Formula One has a very impressive engine at the moment, but is that the engine for the future and where does that go? Whats going to be the engine in five years time? Is there going to be another engine and do we know what it is? If there is another engine in five years time that process needs to start soon with maybe some slightly different objectives to this engine. This engine right now is incredible, but its quite expensive and makes it difficult for the smaller teams. Can we produce an equally impressive technical challenge but make it more viable for the smaller teams?Its those sorts of things, and if you set those objectives now you wont do it next year, but maybe in three years time or five years time you will succeed. That plan can be adjusted like all plans, but at least start getting down with all the stakeholders -- the broadcasters, the promoters of the circuits, the teams, the media, journalists and the fans to understand what they want to see -- and then build that plan, debate it, structure it and see what comes out.I dont think thats been done yet in Formula One, I think its been more reactive to problems. [For example, we say] the audiences are falling, so wed better change something, change qualifying! and we saw what happened there. It wasnt a great success.And then its Mercedes are dominating, wed better change the rules. Well, perhaps thats a solution, but where do we want Formula One to be in three to five years time? Do we know? Maybe we dont know. But it would seem a better process than waiting to see where we are in three to five years time.Interview conducted by Jennie Gow ' ' '