Meister der Farbe » After a while it will lose it

All Blacks skipper Kieran Read is predicting plenty of sore bodies after his sides bruising 36-17 victory over Argentina.The world champions, having already secured the Rugby Championship, blew Argentina away late in the first-half to snare four tries in 13 minutes.A closer second half ensued, primarily the result of prop Joe Moody and blindside flanker Liam Squire being sent to the sin bin.However the All Blacks ultimately cruised to victory as Argentina struggled to break through against 14 men.Read said Los Pumas had once again challenged his side following their rousing first-half display in Hamilton three weeks ago.The All Blacks would now have to regroup in time for next weeks clash with traditional foes South Africa in Durban.A win against the Springboks will complete a perfect Rugby Championship campaign and push the side closer to the record for consecutive Test victories.Wins in Durban and in the third Bledisloe Cup match in Auckland will secure the All Blacks an unprecedented 18 straight Test scalps.They have not lost since their 2015 Rugby Championship decider in Sydney.The Argentinians are a great side and played really well tonight and made us work really hard, especially in the second half, Read said.A stubborn Pumas defence kept the All Blacks tryless in the opening quarter before the world champions flicked the switch to pile on the points.Centre Anton Lienert-Brown barged over for a debut Test try in the 27th minute, before a poor Pumas lineout gifted Ryan Crotty a try five minutes later.A pair of tries to hooker Dane Coles and halfback TJ Perenara in the final two minutes of the half put the game to bed before the second stanza.Fullback Ben Smith extended the lead in the 45th minute before a pair of Pumas consolation tries in the 57th and 76th minutes.Lienert-Brown, making just his second Test start, was a particular stand-out with a try and three assists.The 21-year-old will now tussle with incumbent No.13 Malakai Fekitoa for a starting spot in Durban.Its just so cool to be out there with such a great team setting me up, the Chiefs young gun said.Five-eighth Aaron Cruden, ruled out of the match with a groin strain, was impressed by his Super Rugby teammates performance.His midfield versatility would prove an asset to the side.To play extremely well in both positions only bodes well for him, Cruden said.It was a very polished performance.Fellow Chiefs livewire Damian McKenzie also earned game time at the Estadio Jose Amalfitani, coming on for his debut in the 48th minute. Martin Maldonado Astros Jersey .Y. -- Sabres defenceman Tyler Myers had no intention of changing his hard-hitting style before taking part in a disciplinary hearing for his illegal check to New Jersey forward Dainius Zubrus head. Martin Maldonado Jersey .Y. - Nelson Mandela will be honoured by the New York Yankees with a plaque in Monument Park. https://www.cheapastros.com/2863o-rogelio-armenteros-jersey-astros.html . Cuban testified Thursday that he was upset when the companys CEO told him news that would reduce the value of his shares, for which hed paid $7.5 million. But he said he did nothing improper when he sold those shares over the next two days. Garrett Stubbs Astros Jersey . Soukalova missed only one target and completed the 15-kilometre course in 40 minutes, 32.6 seconds for both victories in this seasons individual discipline. Darya Domracheva of Belarus was second, 34. Kyle Tucker Jersey . LOUIS -- St. Complications arising from the Faf du Plessis ball-tampering episode forced a rethink of the rule, but the MCC world cricket committee has resisted making changes to Law 42.3. Du Plessis, the South Africa captain, was caught on camera using a mint in his mouth to shine the ball during the recent Hobart Test. The ICC found him guilty of ball-tampering, though du Plessis has appealed the verdict.The case raised three issues with the law. Du Plessis argued the law was not clear: how was, for instance, Gatorade-affected saliva different from mint-laden saliva? Many players - recently and long retired - admitted to contravening the law, saying using lollies, mints and sweets was the line the players themselves drew. Even if it was argued that the law was clear, the policing of it - especially the role of the broadcaster as was the case with du Plessis - was ambiguous.MCCs world cricket committee sought to address all three issues. The law, it said, was clear, and spelling out banned substances would always leave room for exploitation. To try to be too prescriptive by listing banned substances would be counterproductive, as something will be missed in the process of such drafting, the MCC release said.John Stephenson, MCCs head of cricket, reiterated that the law was not ambiguous. My advice to them [confused players] would be to not contravene the law, which is very clear. I was part of that [du Plessis] hearing. In my opinion what he did flagrantly contravened the law. He put his finger straight on the mint, straight on the ball, and was caught on camera. It is really a very clear case of ball tampering.Mike Brearley, chairman of the MCC world cricket committee, said that other players admission cannot be a valid defence. If you speed youd probably get away with it, Brearley said. But not everyone does. Sometimes you are caught. And when you are caught flagrantly doing something, you deserve to face the penalty, whatever that penalty is. Which seems to me as far as I know is what happened to Faf du Plessis. The fact that other people do it doesnt mean that you shouldnt catch the odd person who does it flagrantly.That du Plessis was not caught by on-field umpires raised questions about the host broadcasters role in bringing the issue to light. It is near impossible for umpires or the match referee to catch someone shining the ball illegally without the use of cameras.dddddddddddd When Rahul Dravid was caught using a lozenge on the ball, it was done through live footage. In du Plessis case, footage was the incriminating evidence and the MCC admitted it was a concern.We were slightly concerned about host broadcasters, Brearley said. There will be a lot of focus now on people, especially on him [du Plessis] and the South African team I daresay at the moment, and it could be used by home broadcasters. That could happen anyway. After a while it will lose its prominence. Anyway people have to behave. They have to do things according to regulations and laws.Stephenson said they did not want cameras constantly following players when they were shining the ball. Thats certainly not what we want. But as Mike said, if you are not breaking the laws, you have got nothing to worry about, he said. As we all know shining the ball is part of the art of cricket. We want the ball to swing. But it was pretty obvious to me when I saw the footage. You couldnt argue with the fact that his [du Plessis] fingers went straight on the mint and straight on the ball.Former Pakistan batsman Ramiz Raja, a committee member, reassured players about unfair examination by cameras. Mike put it absolutely brilliantly, he said. You must not get caught. It is as simple as that. I think the broadcasters are not looking for such incidents and episodes. Nobody wants this game to be controversial. I think the players are experienced enough to know whats the done thing. Try to live within the perimeters as prescribed, I think lets leave the tampering law as it is.ESPNcricinfo understood that broadcasters do not seek out players shining the ball. Their cameras have been known to look away when players shine the ball, irrespective of the team they belong to. The issue is certain to come up at a meeting of the ICC cricket committee. While the laws of cricket are formulated by the MCC, the ICC has its own playing conditions that supplement the laws. So a rethink on ball-tampering cannot be ruled out yet. ' ' '